Solana vs Ethereum: Which is Better in 2025?
Solana and Ethereum are two of the best-known blockchains in crypto. They are both built to power smart contracts, DeFi apps, NFTs, and much more. Even though they share similar goals, they don’t work the same way, which leads to differences in speed, cost, security, and even decentralization.
As of today, Ethereum still holds the lead in total value locked (TVL) and developer adoption. But Solana isn’t far behind. It has faster transactions and lower fees.
So, which one’s actually better? That totally depends on what you’re looking for. In this article, we will compare the two in terms of key differences, pointing out how each one works.
Solana vs Ethereum: Key Differences at a Glance
Solana and Ethereum do things differently. They don’t use the same rules or the same code, and they even use different methods to process transactions.
| Factor to consider | Ethereum | Solana |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | Proof-of-Stake (PoS) (since the Merge) | Proof-of-History (PoH) + PoS |
| Smart Contract Language | Solidity (Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) standard) | Rust and C (via Anchor framework) |
| TPS (real-world) | ~15-30 | ~2,000+ (can be higher under perfect conditions) |
| Average Transaction Fees | $1–$50 (depending on congestion, L2s help reduce this) | Typically less than $0.01 |
| Ecosystem Age | Launched in 2015 | Launched in 2020 |
| DeFi TVL (2025) | Still leads all chains in TVL | Strong growth in DeFi, closing the gap |
| NFT Presence | Dominant market, especially for high-value NFTs | Strong on Magic Eden with high volume and lower-value trades |
Each one of these key factors helps define what it’s like to actually use or build on the two blockchains. But we still need to dig deeper to better understand how they work.
What is Ethereum?
Ethereum has been around since 2015. It was built so people could run apps and smart contracts directly on the blockchain. Vitalik Buterin, a Canadian computer programmer, pitched the idea in 2013, and since launch, it’s become the main chain for DeFi, NFTs, and trading assets.
In 2022, it moved to Proof of Stake from Proof of Work to use less energy. This move helped the chain to become faster, but fees are still high, and the network still gets slow when it’s busy. That’s why people now rely on Layer 2 solutions like Arbitrum and Optimism to use the chain without losing a lot of money on gas fees.
Despite its shortcomings, Ethereum is still the default for a lot of devs and investors. It’s been around the longest out of the two, it works, and it’s not going anywhere, at least not anytime soon.
What is Solana?
Solana launched in 2020. It was built by Anatoly Yakovenko, a former Qualcomm engineer who wanted to create a faster, cheaper blockchain that didn’t rely on Layer 2s. The blockchain is known for its speedy cheap transactions and its unique approach to timekeeping, thanks to the consensus mechanism PoH.
Unlike Ethereum, Solana doesn’t depend on L2s. Instead, everything happens on the base layer, making the experience much smoother for users. However, it also raises questions about decentralization.
Solana’s speed has made it a go-to for meme coins, NFTs, and high-volume dApps, making it a popular chain for both short-term and long-term investment.
Technology and Scalability: Solana vs Ethereum Performance Compared
Each blockchain takes a different approach to scaling, supporting complex apps and smart contracts, but the way they handle speed, cost, and decentralization is completely different. Let’s see where their paths diverge.
Ethereum
Ethereum runs on PoS, relying heavily on Layer 2 solutions to scale. Projects like Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base handle transactions off-chain, then settle them on Ethereum. This setup helps cut down on gas fees and improve speed, but it adds complexity and trust issues.
It also uses the most adopted standard for smart contracts, EVM, allowing for more tools, more devs, and more compatibility across chains. But all that activity clogs up the Ethereum mainnet when things get busy. On average, it handles about 15 to 30 transactions per second. When demand spikes, fees shoot up fast. It works, but it’s not built for speed.
Solana
Solana works a bit differently. It uses Proof of History, which is basically a built-in clock that lets validators stay in sync without constantly messaging each other. That cuts down on delay and helps the network move fast. In real-world use, Solana clears over 2,000 transactions per second without much strain.
It also runs on a monolithic architecture, which means most activity stays on Layer 1. No need for rollups or extra layers to keep things running. While that makes it fast and cheap, it puts a lot of stress on validators and raises concerns about decentralization. The network has experienced some serious outages in the past, with improvements being integrated to make it more reliable.
So, how does Ethereum scalability vs Solana compare? Ethereum offers long-term flexibility through L2s and strong decentralization, while Solana goes for raw performance with fast and cheap transactions without needing any extra layers. It’s mostly a tradeoff between speed and trust.
Developer Experience: Building on Solana vs Ethereum
Both blockchains support smart contracts and dApps, but they use different languages, making the developer experience different. Here’s how they compare:
| Category | Ethereum | Solana |
|---|---|---|
| Language | Uses Solidity, the standard for smart contract development. Solidity is beginner-friendly and widely used. | Uses Rust or C, often through the Anchor framework. Rust is powerful but harder to learn. |
| Example Use Case | Most DeFi protocols like Aave, Uniswap, and Compound run on Ethereum using Solidity contracts. | Solana dApps like Marinade and Jupiter leverage Rust’s speed for high-volume DeFi and staking tools. |
| Tooling | Mature stack: Hardhat for local development, Truffle for testing, Foundry for power users. | Solana developer tools include Anchor, Solana CLI, and Explorer. Tooling is improving but less extensive. |
| Ecosystem Maturity | Years of dev documentation, tutorials, libraries, and community support. | Still growing; fewer open-source libraries but strong community momentum. |
| Interoperability | Ethereum smart contracts vs Solana: Ethereum’s are EVM-compatible, making it easy to deploy cross-chain. | Not EVM-compatible; code must be rewritten in Rust. |
| Learning Curve | Easier for web developers moving into crypto. Solidity is similar to JavaScript in syntax. | Steeper curve. Rust offers more control but takes longer to master. |
In the Solidity vs Rust blockchain development conversation, Ethereum is winning as it’s more accessible and easier to enter. Most devs can get started quickly using well-documented tools. That’s why Ethereum smart contracts are dominating DeFi and NFTs.
Ecosystem Comparison: NFTs, DeFi, and dApps on Solana vs Ethereum
When it comes to dApps, the two chains attract different types of projects. Ethereum has the lead in value and maturity. Solana’s faster and cheaper, which pulls in a younger, more experimental crowd.
NFTs and Meme Coin Culture
Ethereum is where most NFT collections are live, like Bored Ape Yacht Club, CryptoPunks, and Azuki. It’s the go-to destination for serious collectors. It’s also where Ethereum meme coins like PEPE and Shiba Inu gained popularity, helped by the network’s visibility and large investor base.
Solana, though, dominates in volume. That’s where trading is faster and cheaper, allowing marketplaces like Magic Eden to help build Solana’s strong NFT community. Most NFTs are cheaper, allowing for flipping and experimentation. Solana is also where meme coin culture lives, as projects often launch fast and go viral quickly thanks to low fees and fast trading.
DeFi
Ethereum is dominating DeFi as well when it comes to total value locked (TVL). It’s where major protocols are launched, like Uniswap, Aave, Curve, and Lido. Most L2 projects are also built on Ethereum.
Solana’s playing catch-up with protocols like Jupiter, Marinade, and Orca. They’re growing fast and make things like swapping and staking cheaper and quicker to use. TVL is lower, but usage feels faster and more accessible for smaller traders.
dApps
Both are considered major dApp ecosystems for totally different needs.
Ethereum dApps focus more on DeFi, infrastructure, and high-value NFTs. Most are EVM-compatible and are being adopted more. Meanwhile, Solana dApps lean towards speed-sensitive use cases like gaming, trading, Solana meme coins, and real-time apps.
Solana vs Ethereum Gas Fees and User Costs
When it comes to user experience, gas fees matter the most. It doesn’t matter if you are swapping tokens, minting NFTs, or using DeFi tools; cost matters, especially for smaller users.
Each blockchain takes a unique approach to scaling, which shows in how much users have to pay.
Here’s how real-life activities compare:
| Activity | Ethereum | Solana |
|---|---|---|
| Average Transaction Fee | $1 to $50 (varies based on congestion) | Less than $0.01 |
| NFT Minting | $5–$20 or more during busy periods | Less than $0.01 |
| Token Swap (e.g., Uniswap) | $10–$30 typical | Usually under $0.01 |
| Staking Transaction Fee | ~$1–$5 | Negligible |
| DeFi Actions (borrow/lend) | $10–$40 | Often below $0.01 |
| Gas Fee Variability | Very high; spikes during network congestion | Low and consistent |
| Need for Layer 2s | Strongly recommended to reduce costs | Not needed; almost everything is L1 |
Since the Merge, Ethereum has certainly improved, but the costs still present a tiny problem. You can lower fees by using L2s, but that just adds complexity. Yet, Solana is keeping it simple by keeping transactions fast and cheap, even when it’s busy.
Wallet Support and User Accessibility: Solana vs Ethereum
Wallets play a big role in how people use blockchains. Whether you are staking, trading, or just holding tokens, the right wallet can make a huge difference. Let’s see how Ethereum and Solana deal with user experience, staking support, and security.
User Experience (UX)
Most users choose MetaMask as the best Ethereum wallet, but it might seem complex for beginners. Switching between networks, setting gas fees, or using L2s can feel a bit clunky. Still, it supports a lot of dApps and tokens.
A good crypto wallet for DeFi and NFTs usually includes hardware support and access to EVM-compatible chains.
Solana users, however, go for Phantom because, like most Solana wallets, it offers a cleaner and more modern UX. It’s fast, easy to use, and built specifically for Solana.
Phantom vs MetaMask often comes down to simplicity. Phantom is easier to navigate, especially on mobile, while MetaMask is more suitable for advanced traders.
Staking
On Ethereum, you can stake ETH directly, but doing so requires 32 ETH if you want to run your own validator. Most users stake through platforms like Lido, Coinbase, or Binance. Staking involves gas fees and a slight delay for withdrawals.
For Solana, you can stake directly from Phantom or other wallets quickly without any minimums or extra apps required. It’s faster and cheaper than Ethereum staking.
Security
Ethereum has more wallet options, stronger hardware support, and a more mature ecosystem. Tools like Ledger and Trezor integrate well, and MetaMask has been around long enough to be considered battle-tested. Yet, scams like phishing links, fake tokens, and deceptive airdrops are very common and continue to show up here and there.
Solana is not immune but it is not targeted as much. Wallets like Phantom include built-in features that help reduce risk, like automatic token hiding for spam. And while there have been wallet exploits in the past, these have often been tied to third-party apps or poor key management rather than the protocol itself.
Ethereum has more real-world utility, allowing a lot of online and retail platforms to accept Ethereum as payment outside of DeFi.
Security and Decentralization: Which Blockchain Is More Reliable?
Ethereum and Solana were built to remove the middleman and reduce censorship, which is what blockchain is all about. But, the way that these two chains are handling it differs, as do the results.
Ethereum decentralization is one of its biggest strengths, with over a million validators that don’t require expensive equipment to run. Investors can also stake through services like Lido or Coinbase.
The code is maintained by different teams, and anyone can run a node on basic hardware, keeping power spread out.
Solana is faster as it relies on high-performance hardware. When it comes to Solana validators vs Ethereum, there is a clear contrast. Running a validator is more expensive on Solana. That setup makes it harder for regular people to run a validator. You need powerful (and pricey) hardware, which means fewer people can join. Right now, Solana has under 2,000 validators, and a lot of them are hosted on the same cloud platforms. That’s why people keep bringing up centralization.
Solana’s also had issues with reliability. Between 2021 and 2023, the network went down more than once, including a 20-hour outage in February 2023. No funds were lost, but it definitely made people question how stable the chain really is.
Since then, Solana has been trying to fix these problems by pushing a major upgrade called Firedancer. This independent validator client unit is still in progress, with the goal of reducing bugs, improving throughput, and breaking up centralization.
Don’t forget that no blockchain is safe from every type of scam. Ethereum users are constantly faced with phishing sites, malicious tokens, and even fake airdrops. While Solana sees fewer of these due to its smaller size, the risks are becoming more serious as the chain keeps growing.
Tokenomics and Investment: ETH vs SOL in 2025
It’s important you compare the two when it comes to making investment decisions. Here’s how each chain handles supply, rewards, price, and other factors.
Supply Mechanics
Ethereum uses a dynamic supply model. After the Merge and EIP-1559, ETH supply became deflationary during high network activity. Fees are partially burned, which can reduce total supply over time.
Solana has an inflationary model. It started with 500 million SOL and adds around 1.5% new tokens annually, though that rate is slowly declining.
WINNER: Ethereum thanks to its deflationary supply model that’s more attractive to long-term holders, especially during periods of high demand.
Staking Rewards
Ethereum staking rewards usually fall between 3% and 5% a year, depending on how busy the network is and how many validators are online. If you want to stake solo, you need 32 ETH. Most people don’t have that, so they use platforms like Lido or big exchanges.
Solana’s simpler. You can stake straight from a wallet like Phantom, no minimum required. Rewards are higher too, usually between 6% and 8% a year.
WINNER: Solana: higher yield, no barriers. It’s just easier for most people.
Price Performance and Volatility
Ethereum has a bigger market cap and tends to be more stable. It usually follows the overall market and doesn’t swing as hard on hype alone.
Solana is more volatile. It sees sharper rallies and deeper dips, often linked to news cycles, outages, or meme coin surges.
WINNER: Ethereum, because of its lower volatility and stronger market positioning, which makes it a safer long-term investment.
Institutional Interest
Ethereum is widely held by institutions. It’s included in many crypto funds and has futures and ETF products on major exchanges. It’s also seen as the go-to Layer 1 for enterprise use cases.
Solana’s getting attention from VCs and some hedge funds, but it’s still early. It doesn’t have the same level of institutional support or regulatory clarity that Ethereum has.
WINNER: Ethereum. It’s way ahead when it comes to trust from big players, which gives it more weight long-term.
Final Verdict – Which Blockchain Is Better Overall, Solana or Ethereum?
Deciding which blockchain is best depends on your needs and investment goals. Solana offers superior performance , low fees, and easy staking. It’s also great for NFTs and fast trades. This makes it perfect for those who are looking into high-volume trading, DePIN, and gaming.
Ethereum, though, offers more stability regarding overall value locked and security. It’s leading when it comes to regulatory clarity and size. It is also more decentralized and offers better support for big traders while still being safer for long-term bets.
Before you choose, make sure you know what matters more to you. Are you building? Investing? Or just curious? Knowing what you want and need will help you decide which chain to go for.
Solana vs Ethereum Frequently Asked Questions
Is Solana faster than Ethereum?
Is Solana or Ethereum better for NFTs?
Can Solana replace Ethereum in the future?
Is Solana more environmentally friendly than Ethereum?
Which is better for staking: Ethereum or Solana?
Do Ethereum or Solana support meme coins?
References
- The crypto times: History of Solana’s Network Outages Since Its Inception
- Ethereum: What is Ethereum
- Solana: Blockchain basics
- Defillama: Ethereum
- Ethereum: The Merge Documentation
- Solana: Status History and Incident Reports
Why Trust Cryptonews
in numbers
Mark Hoover 
Eliman Dambell 
