US Congress Now Aims At Decentralized Services Too

Decentralization Justin Sun Politics Regulation USA

Author

Tim Alper

Author

Tim Alper

About Author

Tim Alper is a British journalist and features writer who has worked at Cryptonews.com since 2018. He has written for media outlets such as the BBC, the Guardian, and Chosun Ilbo. He has also worked...

Author Profile

Share

Copied

Last updated:

June 26, 2023 06:55 EDT

Why Trust Cryptonews

Cryptonews has covered the cryptocurrency industry topics since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts have extensive experience in market analysis and blockchain technologies. We strive to maintain high editorial standards, focusing on factual accuracy and balanced reporting across all areas - from cryptocurrencies and blockchain projects to industry events, products, and technological developments. Our ongoing presence in the industry reflects our commitment to delivering relevant information in the evolving world of digital assets. Read more about Cryptonews

Two members of the American Congressional Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence have challenged the decentralized blockchain-powered DLive platform to explain why it was hosting “extremist” content that incited Donald Trump supporters to storm the Capitol building early last month, and allowing streamers to earn crypto while doing so.

As previously reported, groups have claimed that as many as six individuals linked to the incident may have streamed as rioters surrounded the Capitol building on January 6 using DLive, with one believed to have streamed content on the platform while inside the Capitol building.

Streamers on the platform, owned since October 2020 by Tron (TRX) supremo Justin Sun and under the BitTorrent umbrella, can earn the bittorrent token (BTT). And the two Democratic Party lawmakers, Jackie Speier and Raja Krishnamoorthi, wrote to Sun and Charles Wayn, the Chief Executive Officer of Dlive, claiming,

“Your platform live streamed a number of individuals who entered and were around the building. Several of these individuals earned thousands of dollars in DLive’s digital currency that day, and a number received large donations through the platform ahead of the event.”

The politicians claimed that “one individual received USD 2,800 in a live stream on January 5” in which he encouraged his viewers to murder elected officials.”

The duo claimed that Wayn has spoken about DLive’s policy of “tolerating” extremists and “allowing other more popular content producers to ‘dilute’ their reach. “If true,” the politicians wrote, “this is unacceptable.”

And the pair demanded a response from Sun and Wayn by February 12, despite the fact that Wayn has already outlined a series of changes the company wants to make to its user policies.

The committee members challenged Sun and Wayn directly, demanding that they answer if there were “any mechanisms in place to identify foreign-based blockchain donations to users” on the platform.”

They also demanded to know if DLive or BitTorrent had identified “any foreign-based blockchain donations to individuals who were subsequently removed from the platform after the Capitol riots.”

And while the platform claims to be decentralized in nature, the lawmakers did not seek to make a distinction between it and centralized social media and content-sharing platforms, writing,

“We have worked with other platforms such as Facebook, Twitter and YouTube to reform their governance practices around extremist content and that work is still ongoing. But it is clear that DLive is well behind its peers in platform governance and needs to take serious reformative actions.”

____
Learn more:
– A Look Into the Trending Decentralized Social Media Experience: Mastodon
– Massive Google Outage Shows Why Decentralization Is Better
– Trump vs. Twitter Fight Reignites Social Media Decentralization Vision
– Major Youtuber PewDiePie Leaves Decentralized Platform and 800K Followers