Elon Musk ‘Looking for Excuse’ to Ditch Agreement to Buy Twitter, Say Legal Experts After Fresh Bot Claims

Elon Musk M&A Social media Twitter
Last updated:
Author
Author
Tim Alper
About Author

Tim Alper is a British journalist and features writer who has worked at Cryptonews.com since 2018. He has written for media outlets such as the BBC, the Guardian, and Chosun Ilbo. He has also worked...

Last updated:
Why Trust Cryptonews
Cryptonews has covered the cryptocurrency industry topics since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts have extensive experience in market analysis and blockchain technologies. We strive to maintain high editorial standards, focusing on factual accuracy and balanced reporting across all areas - from cryptocurrencies and blockchain projects to industry events, products, and technological developments. Our ongoing presence in the industry reflects our commitment to delivering relevant information in the evolving world of digital assets. Read more about Cryptonews
Elon Musk. Source: a video screenshot, Future Unity / YouTube

 

The Tesla boss Elon Musk’s USD 44 billion bid to buy Twitter may have hit the rocks, with some legal experts claiming that the billionaire may be using the ‘preponderance’ of bots on the social media platform “as an excuse to abandon or renegotiate” his deal.

Bloomberg, which noted that the sale deal “has looked better and better for Twitter” in recent weeks, with share prices tumbling, quoted Andrew Freedman, a partner and activist investment specialist at the legal firm Olshan Frome Wolosky, as stating:

“He’s jockeying here. He’s trying to create a paper trail. The unfortunate thing for Musk is that termination provisions under merger agreements don’t allow for buyer’s remorse.”

However, the same media outlet quoted two sources who it claimed it could not name as they “weren’t authorized to speak publicly” as stating that “behind the scenes,” Musk’s deal to buy Twitter is “proceeding,” with “both sides” still “meeting regularly and sharing information.”

Publicly, however, the story is very different. AP reported that Musk’s legal team had submitted a letter that accused Twitter of only providing details about Twitter’s testing methods. Musk had instead asked to see data on bots on the platform and had previously claimed that up to 20% of accounts may be automated. Twitter leadership has claimed the figure is no higher than 5%.

Musk has previously called cryptoasset-related bots the “single most annoying problem on Twitter.”

Musk’s lawyers wrote that Twitter’s refusal to comply was “tantamount to refusing” Musk’s “data requests,” and represented a “material breach” of the deal agreement. This, they argued, gives Musk the right to walk away from the deal.

They wrote:

“This is a clear material breach of Twitter’s obligations under the merger agreement and Mr. Musk reserves all rights resulting therefrom, including his right not to consummate the transaction and his right to terminate the merger agreement.”

Legal experts claimed that Musk’s options may be limited. If he backs out of the deal, he will have to compensate Twitter to the tune of USD 1 billion.

AP quoted Brian Quinn, a law professor at Boston College, as stating that Musk has already waived his ability to ask for more due diligence – meaning that courts would be unlikely to back any attempt to renegotiate the deal or turn his back on it.

Quin said:

“[Musk is] looking for a way out of the deal or something that will get leverage for a renegotiation of the price. I doubt he would be allowed to walk away. At some point, the board of Twitter will tire of this and file a suit [to force Musk to stick to the original deal].”

But – perhaps ostensibly, perhaps not – the bot issue appears to be a serious bone of contention for Musk. Twitter has told American regulators about its 5% estimates before, but has conceded that its bot count may err on the low side.

In the letter, Musk’s lawyers wrote”

“If Twitter is confident in its publicized spam estimates, Mr. Musk does not understand the company’s reluctance to allow [him] to independently evaluate those estimates.”

Musk has previously stated that the deal is “on hold,” but legal experts speaking to both media outlets appeared to suggest he has little in the way of wriggle room.

Bloomberg quoted Jill Fisch, a business and law specialist at the University of Pennsylvania’s Carey Law School, as stating that Musk was attempting to “reach the capital markets” with his legal team’s statement.

In its own statement made in response to the bot accusations, Twitter said that it “has and will continue to cooperatively share information” with Musk.

Twitter added that it thought the deal was now in the best interest of all of its shareholders and “intends” to “close the transaction and enforce the merger agreement at the agreed price and terms.”

____

Learn more: 
Elon Musk Could Renegotiate Twitter Deal as Bot Number ‘Unknowable as the Human Soul’
Elon Musk Puts Twitter Deal On Hold

Elon Musk May Launch Twitter IPO After Takeover – Report
The ‘Digital Town Square’: What Might Musk’s Twitter Deal Mean?

Binance Backs Twitter Takeover with USD 500m, Musk Could Serve as Interim CEO
Elon’s Twitter: Bluesky Keeps Independence, Dorsey Praises Musk, Market Awaits Next Step

More Articles

Cryptonews Reports
Russian Court Extends Detention of Pilot Arrested for Sending Crypto to Ukraine Military
Tim Alper
Tim Alper
2025-02-13 23:30:00
Price Analysis
Hyperliquid Defies the Crypto Downtrend – Could HYPE Overtake Solana?
Michael Davis
Michael Davis
2025-02-13 23:13:56
Crypto News in numbers
editors
Authors List + 66 More
2M+
Active Monthly Users Around the World
250+
Guides and Reviews Articles
8
Years on the Market
70
International Team Authors