Arthur Hayes Warns of Institutional Hold on Bitcoin – Innovation or Centralization?

Arthur Hayes Bitcoin ETF
Last updated:
Author
Author
Hongji Feng
About Author

Hongji is a crypto and tech reporter. He graduated from Northwestern University's Medill School of Journalism with a Bachelor's and a Master's. He has previously interned at HTX (Huobi Global),...

Last updated:
Why Trust Cryptonews
Cryptonews has covered the cryptocurrency industry topics since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts have extensive experience in market analysis and blockchain technologies. We strive to maintain high editorial standards, focusing on factual accuracy and balanced reporting across all areas - from cryptocurrencies and blockchain projects to industry events, products, and technological developments. Our ongoing presence in the industry reflects our commitment to delivering relevant information in the evolving world of digital assets. Read more about Cryptonews
Bitcoin
Source: Pixabay / WorldSpectrum

Growing institutional custody service over bitcoin is raising alarms. Arthur Hayes, the founder of Maelstrom Fund, said that bitcoin’s core value of decentralization could be at risk.

In a recent podcast with Blockworks, Hayes portrayed a future where dominant financial establishments could consolidate large amounts of bitcoin. “Let’s say Larry Fink and his [traditional finance] ilk come in and hoover up a large percentage of the freely traded bitcoin in circulation,” he said, highlighting the possibility of bitcoin becoming concentrated in few hands.

Institutional Custody Emerges

On a global scale, more traditional finance institutions are embracing the opportunity to offer crypto custody and trading services (ETF). Including the Standard Charted-backed Zodia, the Swiss bank SGKB, and Deutsche Bank, banks representing centralization and even “agents of the state,” according to Hayes, are potentially centralizing bitcoin.

Hayes pointed out that institutions like BlackRock, a key investor in mining operations, could influence the future of cryptos. “If the BlackRock ETF gets too big, it could actually kill bitcoin because it’s just a bunch of immovable bitcoin that’s just sitting there,” he said.

“[The asset managers] act on what the state tell them to do. [The asset managers] went and bough some bitcoin and they put it in a custodian and it sits there,” Hayes explain. “You can’t actually use the bitcoin. It’s a financial asset. It’s not the actual bitcoin itself.”

Hayes vs. Munger: Bitcoin at Crossroads?

Hayes concluded that the institutional custodians would just be “large passive investors” and in a way it may be great for bitcoin’s price in fiat terms. However, there is no definite saying of whether the institutional pursuit of bitcoin control would lead to its eventual downfall.

“Are we, you know, gaining a sugar high today to only engender a massive calamity in the future? I don’t know.” Hayes said.

On the contrary, Berkshire Hathaway’s Charlie Munger just listed bitcoin’s rise as “rat poison” and disruptive threat to traditional finance.

More Articles

Opinions
Opinion: Crypto Has a Trust Problem—Here’s How We Can Fix It
Mona El Isa
Mona El Isa
2025-02-16 18:08:06
Features
Coinbase Just Made Huge Predictions on Crypto’s Future
Connor Sephton
Connor Sephton
2025-02-16 18:03:15
Crypto News in numbers
editors
Authors List + 66 More
2M+
Active Monthly Users Around the World
250+
Guides and Reviews Articles
8
Years on the Market
70
International Team Authors