WSJ: Circle, BitGo Pursue Elusive U.S. Bank Charters—Only Anchorage Holds One

Crypto firms Circle and BitGo plan to apply for U.S. banking licenses, according to a report by The Wall Street Journal published on April 21.

The move comes amid shifting political dynamics, including a push from the Trump administration to integrate crypto more fully into the banking system.

Circle and BitGo Prepare for Licensing Shift

Legislation advancing in Congress would establish a framework for stablecoins and require issuers to operate under a federal or state charter.

Sources told WSJ that Circle, Paxos, and Coinbase are weighing similar regulatory pathways. The types of licenses under consideration range from national trust charters to industrial bank charters, which would allow activities such as holding deposits or issuing stablecoins.

BitGo, which serves as custodian for BlackRock’s Bitcoin ETF, is reportedly close to submitting an application.

The only crypto company with a federal charter at the moment, Anchorage Digital, told WSJ that it has taken a large financial outlay to meet compliance standards.

The chartering business is also entangled with broader developments. World Liberty Finance, a crypto venture with connections to the Trump family, has announced that it will soon unveil a stablecoin, USD1, whose custodian will be BitGo.

Meet USD1 — the stablecoin your portfolio’s been waiting for.

Built for institutions and retail alike. Backed by dollars. Custodied by BitGo.
No games. No gimmicks. Just real stability.https://t.co/vXPbZe0GPn

— WLFI (@worldlibertyfi) March 25, 2025

Repositioning for Institutional Acceptance

While regulatory interest in the sector remains uneven, the report suggests that firms previously operating on the margins of the banking system are now preparing to enter it through formal channels.

The shift follows earlier setbacks, when multiple crypto firms lost access to key banking services in the wake of FTX’s collapse and the shutdown of crypto-friendly banks like Silvergate and Signature.

Regulators remain split on how tightly to draw the perimeter. Some agencies have resisted defining crypto’s legal standing in traditional finance, wary of introducing new systemic risks before clearer safeguards are in place.

Yet the movement toward charters shows a deeper shift that crypto’s next phase may depend less on disruptive narratives and more on structural alignment.

For companies that once thrived on regulatory ambiguity, survival now could mean learning to function within the very institutions they were built to bypass.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs):