SEC’s Absence at Binance Settlement Announcement Raises Questions
We believe in full transparency with our readers. Some of our content includes affiliate links, and we may earn a commission through these partnerships. However, this potential compensation never influences our analysis, opinions, or reviews. Our editorial content is created independently of our marketing partnerships, and our ratings are based solely on our established evaluation criteria. Read More
Ad Disclosure
We believe in full transparency with our readers. Some of our content includes affiliate links, and we may earn a commission through these partnerships. Read more
The recent $4.3 billion settlement between Binance and various US government agencies, announced by top Biden administration officials, has stirred controversy due to the absence of Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair Gary Gensler at the announcement.
While Attorney General Merrick Garland and Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen were present, Gensler’s absence raised eyebrows, especially considering the SEC’s ongoing legal dispute with Binance, the influential business news outlet Wall Street Journal reported on Monday.
Citing insiders “familiar with the matter,” the report revealed that the SEC was not part of the extensive settlement talks that led to Binance and its founder, Changpeng Zhao (CZ), pleading guilty and resolving civil charges with the US Treasury Department.
The absence of the SEC indicates the challenges and high stakes involved in settling with a regulatory body that, although lacking the authority to imprison individuals, holds significant power to disrupt and potentially shut down US companies that operates in the crypto space.
Futile attempts at reaching settlement with SEC
Before the SEC filed its lawsuit against Binance in June, attempts to reach a settlement were reportedly futile, as the parties couldn’t agree on terms.
According to the Wall Street Journal’s sources, a settlement on the SEC’s terms could have compelled Binance to shutter much of its US crypto trading operations and accept claims that its “affiliates engaged in manipulative trading.”
The report also said that various government agencies before filing the lawsuit against Binance tried to get the company to accept an injunction, a deal that would reportedly prevent Binance’s US arm from offering trading in many of the tokens it had listed at the time.
“That would sort of be the end of Binance.US,” Lee Reiners, an economics lecturer at Duke University, told the Wall Street Journal.
Now, however, Binance appears to remain steadfast in defending its case against the SEC, saying in a comment “We remain confident in our case against the SEC and will continue to defend our platform vigorously.”
- How Tether Co-Founder William Quigley Views Crypto Regulations in Trump’s Second Term
- Trump Appoints PayPal Veteran David Sacks as ‘White House AI and Crypto Czar’
- Trump Media and Technology Group Files for ETFs, SMAs
- Trader Explains Why XRP Could Skyrocket to $100 After Tristan Tate X Post
- Bitwise’s Matt Hougan Makes Big Prediction on Bitcoin’s Next Bear Market






