Mark Uyeda Might Lead the SEC Under Trump’s Presidency, Lawyer Suggests

Author

Ruholamin Haqshanas

Author

Ruholamin Haqshanas

About Author

Ruholamin Haqshanas is a contributing crypto writer for CryptoNews. He is a crypto and finance journalist with over four years of experience. Ruholamin has been featured in several high-profile crypto...

Author Profile

Share

Copied

Last updated: 

November 7, 2024

Why Trust Cryptonews

Cryptonews has covered the cryptocurrency industry topics since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts have extensive experience in market analysis and blockchain technologies. We strive to maintain high editorial standards, focusing on factual accuracy and balanced reporting across all areas - from cryptocurrencies and blockchain projects to industry events, products, and technological developments. Our ongoing presence in the industry reflects our commitment to delivering relevant information in the evolving world of digital assets. Read more about Cryptonews

As speculation is mounting within the cryptocurrency community about potential changes in the leadership of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) following election results, Mark Uyeda, a current SEC commissioner, is emerging as a strong contender to take the reins.

The suggestion was put forward by crypto attorney Jake Chervinsky in a November 6 post on X.

Uyeda, who joined the SEC as a commissioner on June 30, 2022, has been a vocal critic of the current regulatory regime under SEC Chair Gary Gensler.

Uyeda Criticizes Gensler’s Crypto Policies

In October, Uyeda described Gensler’s crypto policies as a “disaster for the whole industry.”

“I think our policies and our approach over the last several years have been just really a disaster for the whole industry,” he said.

His opposition to enforcement-heavy regulation has garnered support from advocates seeking a more constructive and cooperative approach to crypto oversight.

Trump has already pledged to fire Gensler on his first day in office, fueling speculation about who might succeed him.

While Commissioner Hester Peirce, often called “Crypto Mom” for her defense of crypto innovation, has been considered a potential candidate, Chervinsky believes her chances are slim.

Peirce, appointed by Trump in January 2018, has frequently criticized the SEC’s restrictive policies and advocated for open communication with the industry.

However, Chervinsky suggests that Peirce may not be interested in the challenging role of SEC chair.

“Being chair is a pretty hard, thankless, miserable job,” Chervinsky wrote, noting that while Uyeda might be inclined to take on the position, others, like Peirce, may prefer to move on.

Chervinsky also speculated that Trump could opt for a fresh face to lead the SEC rather than promoting from within.

Regardless of the choice, the crypto community sees a leadership change as critical to ending what some describe as “regulation by enforcement,” which has led to lawsuits against major crypto firms and the prosecution of Tornado Cash developers.

Mark Uyeda Might Step In But SEC Is Under Scrutiny

As of late, the SEC has been facing growing criticism due to its “regulation-by-enforcement” approach to the crypto industry.

Critics argue that the SEC has failed to establish a clear regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies, opting instead to pursue legal action against key industry players.

As reported, a coalition of seven U.S. states has come together to challenge the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) regulation of cryptocurrency.

Led by Iowa Attorney General Brenna Bird, the states have filed an amicus brief arguing that the SEC’s attempt to regulate cryptocurrencies constitutes a “power grab” that would stifle innovation, harm the crypto industry, and exceed the agency’s authority.

The coalition includes Arkansas, Indiana, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, with Oklahoma becoming the latest state to join.

Earlier this year, SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce said that the regulatory agency is currently operating in an “enforcement-only mode” when it comes to the regulation of cryptocurrencies.