Cryptonews Blockchain News

JYS Group Crashes After $180M Investment – Chairman Fled to UK

A failed mix of high-yield promises and speculative bets, including crypto, left thousands out of pocket—and exposed deeper risks in the lightly regulated investment scene.

Author

Hongji Feng

Author

Hongji Feng

About Author

Hongji is a crypto and tech reporter. He graduated from Northwestern University's Medill School of Journalism with a Bachelor's and a Master's. He has previously interned at HTX (Huobi Global),...

Author Profile

Last updated:

May 1, 2025

Why Trust Cryptonews

Cryptonews has covered the cryptocurrency industry topics since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts have extensive experience in market analysis and blockchain technologies. We strive to maintain high editorial standards, focusing on factual accuracy and balanced reporting across all areas - from cryptocurrencies and blockchain projects to industry events, products, and technological developments. Our ongoing presence in the industry reflects our commitment to delivering relevant information in the evolving world of digital assets. Read more about Cryptonews

Key Takeaways:

JYS Group’s chairman, Lin Chunhao, claimed to have fled to the UK and released a farewell message outlining financial failures.
Investors were recruited through seminars and promised returns as high as 9% on municipal infrastructure-related products.
Much of the money was lost in areas including P2P lending, crypto trading, stock speculation, and promissory notes.

JYS Group, a Chinese investment firm based in Guangdong province, collapsed in mid-April after raising an estimated ¥1.34 billion (approximately $180 million) for “high-return” schemes, including crypto.

According to a May 2 report by The Economic Observer, the company’s chairman, Lin Chunhao, announced his departure from China via a WeChat group, stating that he had arrived in the UK following failed investments.

Lin’s Escape Sparks Criminal Probe

“By the time you read this, I am already on British soil,” he wrote. Lin claimed personal losses exceeding $96 million and said all funds had been spent on interest payments, salaries, and operating costs.

JYS marketed its offerings by targeting retail investors through financial literacy seminars.

Participants were offered high-yield products with annualized returns of 6% to 9% and maturity periods ranging from three to 36 months. Some were introduced to the schemes through family connections.

The fund was raised from retail investors across several cities, including Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Foshan, and Zhongshan.

The products were managed by Shenzhen Haiboxin Project Management Co., Ltd., which promoted itself as affiliated with state-owned firms.

Investigations later revealed shared offices and personnel with JYS, casting doubt on its claims of independence.

Offices in Shenzhen and Zhongshan were found shuttered, and local authorities have begun investigations. The Shenzhen Public Security Bureau’s Economic Crime Investigation Division is leading the inquiry.

Crypto Promises Masked Mounting Losses

Some investors increased their exposure to JYS Group under pressure from sales agents, with some people committing over $80,000.

The company collapsed within two months of these investments. By the time investors realized the risks, many of the agents who had encouraged their participation could no longer be reached.

While investors were initially told their funds were backing municipal infrastructure projects, such as roads and tunnels, Lin provided no evidence to support these claims in his final statement.

Lin’s farewell message referenced failed ventures but did not mention any specific infrastructure assets in China. Instead, it listed a string of unsuccessful investments across sectors, including peer-to-peer lending, crypto trading, and stock speculation.

According to a financial breakdown shared in the message, losses spanned multiple areas: nearly $10 million each from bad debts, failed crypto trades, and promissory note defaults.

🇨🇳 Beijing has released a multi-agency action plan to integrate blockchain across sectors like AI, finance, and healthcare by 2027.#AI #blockchain #china https://t.co/MRhusQySs3
— Cryptonews.com (@cryptonews) April 29, 2025

The collapse of JYS Group points to a broader vulnerability in the investment sector, where financial products like crypto that are marketed as secure and high-yield often operate with little oversight.

Despite repeated warnings from regulators, schemes continue to attract middle-class investors drawn by promises of above-market returns.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs):

How are firms like JYS able to operate without regulatory checks?

Quasi-financial entities often operate in grey areas under the guise of “project management” or education services, avoiding immediate scrutiny unless complaints or collapses trigger investigations.

What should investors look out for to avoid similar schemes?

Red flags include high promised returns, pressure from sales agents, and a lack of independent third-party auditing. Regulatory registration alone isn’t sufficient proof of legitimacy.

What happens to investors when perpetrators flee abroad?

Cross-border recovery is notoriously difficult. Unless formal extradition treaties and asset recovery channels are in place, investors often face years of legal limbo with little prospect of compensation.