BNB -0.90%
BTC -1.30%
DOGE -0.99%
ETH -1.53%
PEPE -4.38%
XRP -0.93%
SHIB -0.46%
SOL 0.42%
TG Casino
powered by $TGC

Digital Dollar Would Undermine Banks, No Compelling Case for It, US Bankers Argue

Fredrik Vold
Last updated: | 2 min read
Source: AdobeStock / vectorfusionart


The purported benefits of a central bank digital currency (CBDC) in the United States are “uncertain and unlikely to be realized,” and there is no compelling case for it, the American Bankers Association (ABA) has said in a letter to the US Federal Reserve (Fed). The letter also warned that a CBDC could undermine the banks’ business model.

In the letter, the bankers argued that a US CBDC is “not necessary to ‘digitize the dollar,’ as the dollar is largely digital today.” It added that a CBDC would “fundamentally rewire our banking and financial system” and would change the relationship between citizens and the Federal Reserve.

“The main policy obstacle to developing, deploying, and maintaining a CBDC in the real economy is the lack of compelling use cases where a CBDC delivers benefits above those available from other existing options,” the letter stated.

The ABA said in its letter to the Fed that,

“As we have evaluated the likely impacts of issuing a CBDC it has become clear that the purported benefits of a CBDC are uncertain and unlikely to be realized, while the costs are real and acute.”

And it concluded that,  

“Based on this analysis, we do not see a compelling case for a CBDC in the United States today.”

Meanwhile, another key reason for the bankers’ opposition to a US CBDC, often referred to as a digital dollar, is that it would act as a direct competitor to private bank deposits, and limit the availability of credit to both businesses and individuals.

A CBDC would draw retail deposits away from private banks and “into accounts at the Federal Reserve,” the letter said. From here, funds cannot be lent back into the economy, the bankers warned.

It noted that retail deposits account for 71% of bank funding today, and said taking this away would “undermine the economics of the banking business model.”

The letter from the ABA came in response to a Fed January paper that discussed the benefits and risks of a potential US CBDC.

In the past, Fed Chairman Jerome Powell sent mixed signals about whether private stablecoins could continue to co-exist alongside a CBDC in the US. In a hearing in January this year, Powell said that there is nothing that would preclude private stablecoins from being issued and used alongside a Fed-issued CBDC. 

However, in July last year, he stated that the US could remove the need for digital assets, particularly stablecoins, by issuing a CBDC.

“In particular, you wouldn’t need stablecoins, you wouldn’t need cryptocurrencies if you had a digital US currency – I think that’s one of the stronger arguments in its favor,” he stated back then.


Learn more: 
CBDC: A Solution in Search of a Problem?
US Senator Suggests Banning Fed From Issuing a Direct-to-Consumer CBDC

SWIFT, Capgemini Team Up On Developing Global CBDC Interlinks
G7 Keeps Pushing for Crypto Regulation, Here’s What’s Already Happening

Number of Central Banks Involved in CBDC Projects Almost Doubles in One Year
Russia Sanctions May Lead More Countries To Consider CBDCs, Ex-Central Banker Says