Crypto Investment Firm Paradigm Challenges SEC’s Jurisdiction in Bittrex Lawsuit

SEC Securities and Exchange Commission
Last updated:
Author
Author
Ruholamin Haqshanas
About Author

Ruholamin Haqshanas is a contributing crypto writer for CryptoNews. He is a crypto and finance journalist with over four years of experience. Ruholamin has been featured in several high-profile crypto...

Last updated:
Why Trust Cryptonews
Cryptonews has covered the cryptocurrency industry topics since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts have extensive experience in market analysis and blockchain technologies. We strive to maintain high editorial standards, focusing on factual accuracy and balanced reporting across all areas - from cryptocurrencies and blockchain projects to industry events, products, and technological developments. Our ongoing presence in the industry reflects our commitment to delivering relevant information in the evolving world of digital assets. Read more about Cryptonews
Ad DisclosureWe believe in full transparency with our readers. Some of our content includes affiliate links, and we may earn a commission through these partnerships.
Image Source: Depositphotos

Prominent crypto investment firm Paradigm has challenged the US Securities and Exchange Commission‘s authority to regulate secondary markets for crypto assets.

The company has filed an amicus brief in the SEC’s case against cryptocurrency exchange Bittrex, challenging the regulator’s attempt to expand its jurisdiction over crypto secondary markets, Paradigm’s special counsel Rodrigo Seira said in a recent statement.

In the legal document submitted to the court, Paradigm argued that the SEC’s claims against Bittrex and other crypto exchanges are fundamentally different from its previous cases against token sellers.

While the SEC previously sought to regulate fundraising schemes under the Howey test, Paradigm noted that the agency is now attempting to extend its authority to include downstream sales of crypto assets. 

“The SEC’s lawsuit against Bittrex is the first of three cases that the SEC has brought in rapid succession against crypto exchanges,” Seira wrote in the blog post.

As reported, last month, the SEC sued both Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, and Coinbase, the largest US-based cryptocurrency exchange. 

“Through these actions, the SEC is wrongfully attempting to lay claim over crypto secondary markets.”

Bittrex, a Seattle-based exchange, announced in early April that it would wind down US operations due to the challenging regulatory and economic environment in the country. 

Shortly after, the SEC charged Bittrex, its co-founder and former CEO William Shihara, and its foreign affiliate Bittrex Global for operating an unregistered national securities exchange, broker, and clearing agency. 

The agency claimed that Bittrex had facilitated the buying and selling of crypto assets since at least 2014, earning at least $1.3 billion in revenues from transaction fees.

Less than a month after the SEC’s complaint against Bittrex US, the platform filed for bankruptcy in a federal court in Delaware in early May.

In the announcement, the exchange noted that the bankruptcy filing would not impact Bittrex Global, which serves customers outside the United States. The exchange will continue operations “as normal” for customers outside the US. 

Paradigm Accuses SEC of Inconsistent Stance on Crypto Regulation

Paradigm, which previously filed a similar amicus brief in support of Coinbase, criticized SEC Chair Gary Gensler for his inconsistent stance on regulating secondary markets. 

Paradigm argued that Gensler himself admitted that the agency lacked the authority to regulate these markets in 2021. 

However, the SEC is now asserting that it possesses the authority and is seeking retroactive penalties against companies that have not complied.

The investment firm also contended that even if a cryptocurrency asset was initially sold in an ICO, the SEC has no legal basis to argue that the asset itself constitutes an investment contract. 

“In the last six years, the SEC has pursued dozens of enforcement actions against persons who have sold crypto assets as part of their fundraising efforts, and courts have agreed that some of those sales were ‘investment contract’ offerings under the Howey test,” the company said in the court filing.

According to Paradigm, the few courts that have examined the distinction between token offerings and tokens in secondary markets have all recognized that the Howey test does not apply to transactions between third parties. 

The firm concluded that the SEC’s theories as unprecedented and urged the court to dismiss the case against Bittrex.

More Articles

Blockchain News
Fireblocks Sets Up Tokyo Office to Strengthen Asia-Pacific Presence
Jai Pratap
Jai Pratap
2024-12-12 03:55:06
Blockchain News
Russian Scientists Say They’ve Developed a Solution to ‘Fight BTC, ETH-powered Crime’
Tim Alper
Tim Alper
2024-12-12 03:00:00
Crypto News in numbers
editors
Authors List + 66 More
2M+
Active Monthly Users Around the World
250+
Guides and Reviews Articles
8
Years on the Market
70
International Team Authors