Central Banks Step Up Bitcoin, Stablecoin Bashing Efforts Amid CBDC Plans
Ad Disclosure
We believe in full transparency with our readers. Some of our content includes affiliate links, and we may earn a commission through these partnerships.The Bank for International Settlements keeps bashing cryptocurrencies, such as bitcoin (BTC), and stablecoins, while preparing the ground for central bank digital currencies (CBDC), saying that they “open a new chapter for the monetary system.”
Central bank interest in CBDCs comes at a critical time when three major recent developments placed certain “potential innovations” involving digital currencies “high on the agenda,” the BIS, owned by central banks, said in its annual economic report. These developments are:
- the growing attention received by BTC and other cryptoassets;
- the stablecoin debate;
- and the entry of big techs into payment services and financial services more generally.
When it comes to stablecoins, the BIS claims that, to the extent that their backing involves conventional money, they are “ultimately only an appendage to the conventional monetary system and not a game changer.”
Also, the BIS says that for them, “it is clear” that cryptoassets are speculative assets rather than money, used in many cases for financial crimes. “Bitcoin in particular has few redeeming public interest attributes when also considering its wasteful energy footprint,” they reiterated previous claims by BTC skeptics that have been rebutted by bitcoiners on multiple occasions.
In either case, the BIS claims that CBDCs are moving away from simply being a concept.
Hyun Song Shin, the BIS’s Economic Adviser and Head of Research, is quoted as saying that “CBDCs are a concept whose time has come,” and that they “open a new chapter for the monetary system by providing a technologically advanced representation of central bank money.” The press release added that CBDCs are “moving from concept to practical design and renew the institution of money in a new form designed for the digital age.”
Also, the ‘CBDCs: an opportunity for the monetary system’ goes to make several conclusions in regards to the CBDCs design and practical use, in the context of central banks’ four key roles in the monetary system:
- providing the unit of account;
- providing the means for ensuring the finality of wholesale payments by using their own balance sheets as the ultimate means of settlement;
- ensuring that the payment system works smoothly;
- and overseeing the payment system’s integrity, while upholding a competitive level playing field – as BIS writes.
Per the BIS, CBDCs are best designed as part of a two-tier system where the central bank focuses on operating the core of the system by ensuring sound money, liquidity, and security, while the private sector focuses on innovation and using their “creativity” to serve customers better.
“By preserving the two-tier system, the central bank keeps its financial system footprint small, just as cash does today [and its] money can then retain its core attribute of neutrality,” they said.
The BIS also advocates for the “most promising” design, from a practical perspective, which is “an account-based CBDC, rooted in an efficient digital identity scheme for users.” It would be tied to a digital identity that would require users to identify themselves to access funds. Per the report, this would work to protect users against the abuse of a huge volume of personal data collected as an input into business activity, while also protecting the payment system against illicit activities.
The authors of the report also stressed that “international cooperation on design will be vital if central banks are to harness the full benefits of CBDCs, and to improve cross-border payments while countering foreign currency substitution.”
Also, they mentioned a possible concern that “a foreign jurisdiction’s CBDC could magnify the risk of currency substitution.” But an account-based CBDC would have built-in safeguards against an “encroachment” of that kind, they claim.
“Above all, no payment system exists separately from the underlying economic transactions. International currencies have developed as a result of the transactional needs of their users. A currency is unlikely to achieve international status merely because it is in digital form,” the BIS said.
___
Learn more:
– Russia’s Foreign Minister: Crypto Will Inevitably Play Role in Int’l Trade
– Beijing Readies USD 6.2m Digital Yuan Trial Amid Claims Main Rival Is Bitcoin
– Digital Yuan Architect: ‘Imagine a CBDC on Ethereum or Diem’
– Imagine Bitcoin as a Reserve Asset. What Then?
– Experts Warn of Tighter Policing Ahead for Stablecoins
– Prepare For ‘Uncertain Future of Money’ – US Intelligence Center
– If a CBDC Is an ‘Instrument of Control,’ It’ll Fail – Expert
– Economists: CBDCs to ‘Flop’ if They Aren’t Designed as Stores of Value
– 2021 Trends in CBDCs: More Pilots, Maybe Some Launches, But Not For Retail
– Public and Private Money Can Coexist in the Digital Age
- Why the XRP Price Could Hit $40 in 3 Months as Ripple News Excites Market
- XRP Worth $225m in Mystery Move as Ripple Token Flips BNB And Price Soars to $1.76, Next Stop $5?
- Here is Why SUI Could Reach $28 If Bitcoin Crosses the $100k Barrier
- NYDFS Set to Approve Ripple Labs’ Overcollateralized RLUSD Stablecoin
- Grayscale’s Crypto Holdings Surge in November Amid Stellar and XRP’s Triple-Digit Gains