Binance Urges U.S. Court to Dismiss Class Action, Citing Arbitration Clause in User Terms

Arbitration Binance Securities
Binance’s arbitration push could derail a key crypto class action as it leans on offshore terms and pre-IPO legal maneuvering to stay out of U.S. courtrooms.
Journalist
Journalist
Hassan Shittu
About Author

Hassan, a Cryptonews.com journalist with 6+ years of experience in Web3 journalism, brings deep knowledge across Crypto, Web3 Gaming, NFTs, and Play-to-Earn sectors. His work has appeared in...

Last updated: 
Why Trust Cryptonews
Cryptonews has covered the cryptocurrency industry topics since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts have extensive experience in market analysis and blockchain technologies. We strive to maintain high editorial standards, focusing on factual accuracy and balanced reporting across all areas - from cryptocurrencies and blockchain projects to industry events, products, and technological developments. Our ongoing presence in the industry reflects our commitment to delivering relevant information in the evolving world of digital assets. Read more about Cryptonews

Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, has asked a U.S. court to dismiss a class action lawsuit filed by American investors, citing an arbitration clause in its user agreement.

The motion was submitted on Friday, marking the latest legal maneuver by the company as it continues to face regulatory and legal pressure in the United States.

The class action, filed earlier this year in the Northern District of California, accuses Binance of violating securities laws by offering and promoting unregistered crypto tokens.

The plaintiffs also allege that Binance misled investors about the safety and regulatory status of certain assets listed on its platform.

Binance Seeks Dismissal Based on Arbitration Clause

On March 28, U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr. ruled that Binance could not force arbitration for users who purchased tokens between April 1, 2017, and February 20, 2019, prior to the implementation of its amended terms of use.

For users who bought tokens after that date but before receiving actual notice of the arbitration clause, the judge also denied Binance’s motion, but without prejudice.

He then vacated that decision on April 16, allowing both parties to file additional briefs on the issue.

In its motion to dismiss, Binance argues that its user agreement includes a binding arbitration clause and a class action waiver, which requires disputes to be resolved privately rather than in court.

The clause, the company claims, was clearly disclosed and agreed to by users at the time of account registration.

“Each Plaintiff agreed to resolve any disputes through binding arbitration governed by the rules of the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre,” Binance’s legal team stated in the filing.

The exchange further emphasized that the plaintiffs’ claims fall squarely within the scope of the arbitration clause.

Binance argues users agree to arbitrate all claims by accepting the terms of service Source: Law360.com

“Plaintiffs who accepted the 2019 terms agreed to arbitrate all claims arising on or after Feb. 20, 2019,” Binance said. It also claimed that its earlier terms already allowed unilateral amendments without notifying individual users, suggesting those users should be bound retroactively.

Global Legal Heat Continues as Arbitration Strategy Comes Under Scrutiny

This legal dispute stems from a broader class action initially dismissed in 2022, when Judge Carter sided with Binance’s argument that it was not subject to U.S. securities laws due to its offshore status.

That decision was overturned in March 2024 by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, and the Supreme Court declined to hear Binance’s appeal in January.

Beyond this case, Binance continues to face mounting legal pressures globally. In the U.S., it settled with regulators in November 2023 for $4.3 billion over allegations of selling unregistered securities and failing to maintain proper compliance controls.

Founder Changpeng Zhao pleaded guilty to a related criminal charge and agreed to a $150 million personal settlement, while Binance paid $2.7 billion to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).

Binance’s legal troubles have also spread to Canada, where a class action lawsuit was filed in April 2024 over alleged securities law violations following its exit from the market in 2023.

Logo

Why Trust Cryptonews

2M+
Active Monthly Users Around the World
250+
Guides and Reviews Articles
8
Years on the Market
70
International Team Authors
editors
+ 66 More

Best Crypto ICOs

Discover trending tokens still in presale — early-stage picks with potential

Explore Our Tools

Smart tools made for everyday crypto users

Market Overview

  • 7d
  • 1m
  • 1y
Market Cap
$4,016,007,198,961
6.38
Trending Crypto

More Articles

Altcoin News
Binance Lawsuit in Canada Following Securities Law Violation Allegations
Harvey Hunter
Harvey Hunter
2024-04-23 11:44:26
Blockchain News
Binance Arguments to Dismiss Lawsuit Lack Merit, SEC Argues In New Filing
David Pokima
David Pokima
2023-11-09 08:34:36
Crypto News in numbers
editors
Authors List + 66 More
2M+
Active Monthly Users Around the World
250+
Guides and Reviews Articles
8
Years on the Market
70
International Team Authors