Opinion: Mixing Crypto and Mortgages is a Recipe for Disaster

Adoption Altcoins Bitcoin Blockchain Cryptocurrency Donald Trump

Features writer

Connor Sephton

Features writer

Connor Sephton

About Author

Connor Sephton is a journalist based in London, who also works for Sky News and the BBC as a radio newsreader and online reporter. He has covered crypto since 2018 — reporting from major conferences...

Author Profile

Share

Copied

Last updated: 

June 26, 2025

Why Trust Cryptonews

Cryptonews has covered the cryptocurrency industry topics since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts have extensive experience in market analysis and blockchain technologies. We strive to maintain high editorial standards, focusing on factual accuracy and balanced reporting across all areas - from cryptocurrencies and blockchain projects to industry events, products, and technological developments. Our ongoing presence in the industry reflects our commitment to delivering relevant information in the evolving world of digital assets. Read more about Cryptonews

In an extraordinary policy shift, the U.S. Federal Housing Finance Agency has said borrowers may soon be able to use crypto investments to qualify for mortgages.

Michael Saylor could barely contain his glee when details of the order emerged — describing it as “a defining moment for collateral recognition.”

Then again, this is pretty unsurprising considering he was reckless enough to suggest consumers should take out mortgages to invest in Bitcoin.

The plans were put forward by FHFA director Bill Pulte, who himself is a substantial investor in digital assets. Sharing the proposal on X, he wrote:

“After significant studying, and in keeping with President Trump’s vision to make the United States the crypto capital of the world, today I ordered the Great Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to prepare their businesses to count cryptocurrency as an asset for a mortgage.”

But at this point, it’s worth taking a huge step back — and considering the potential ramifications that this policy could have on homeowners and the economy.

We all know how volatile Bitcoin can be. It’s accelerated from $61,000 to $107,000 over the past 12 months. Such dramatic price movements also work both ways, with a devastating plunge from $68,000 to $16,000 back in 2022.

Embracing BTC as collateral would mean enthusiasts no longer need to convert their coins back into dollars, but can retain them in the hope of future price rises. On the flipside though, there is a real risk that a homeowner’s crypto stash could be liquidated in the event of a sudden downturn. Put another way, it would mean slavishly monitoring prices to prevent a devastating margin call.

24h7d30d1yAll time

Digital assets are also a pretty impractical source of funding for a house purchase. When fiat is used, applicants may only need a 5% to 10% cash deposit — meaning they can borrow the rest and make monthly repayments. By contrast, most crypto mortgage providers require 100% collateralization. In other words, if you’ve got your heart set on a $300,000 house, you’d need to pledge $300,000 of coins. It’s also worth noting that lenders typically only accept BTC and ETH, meaning that your DOGE bags wouldn’t get you very far in the application process.

Critics are already sharing fears that injecting crypto into the housing market could contribute to a 2008-like financial crisis, where a slew of high-risk mortgages defaulted and sparked a global recession. Given the U.S. government implicitly guarantees home loans issued by Fannie and Freddie Mac, there’s also a real danger that an implosion in Bitcoin’s value could end up costing taxpayers.

Are There Any Benefits?

In the interests of balance, it’s important to acknowledge the pain points that crypto investors currently face as they try to get on the property ladder — a substantial challenge as house prices continue to spiral out of control.

For one, lenders in some countries actually penalize applicants if transactions involving crypto exchanges appear on their statements. That’s grossly unfair, and an outdated mindset that urgently needs to change.

Many banks are also incredibly inflexible when considering income sources — especially when it comes to the self-employed. Someone working as a sole trader with an income of $100,000 could end up being able to borrow substantially less than a full-time employee with an identical salary.

A few years ago, data from Redfin also revealed that about 12% of first-time buyers were selling crypto in order to finance their downpayment. Given how Bitcoin’s value has risen markedly since then, this means they will have missed out on a substantial amount of profit.

Josip Rupena, CEO of the crypto mortgage firm Milo, recently told Mortgage Professional America:

“There’s a lot of clients that have amassed Bitcoin wealth from over 10 years ago, when Bitcoin was trading at $100. Now, Bitcoin trading is at $85,000. It’s become a significant portion of their net worth, and they don’t want to sell it.”

It’s unacceptable for crypto investors to be treated like pariahs by lenders. Everyone needs a home. But these guidelines put forward by the FHFA actually have the potential to endanger these Bitcoin holders, and put the economy at risk by tying the fates of digital assets and traditional finance even closer together.

Bitcoin’s looking rosy right now — and pushing $108,000. But what will happen in the next bear market, when there’s a real chance of an 80% crash, and what would it mean for the homeowners who have a roof over their heads because of their crypto stash?

Disclaimer: The opinions in this article are the writer’s own and do not necessarily represent the views of Cryptonews.com. This article is meant to provide a broad perspective on its topic and should not be taken as professional advice.