Cryptonews Features

MiCA Pushes EU to Adapt: ‘Not Everyone Will Make the Cut’

As MiCA takes effect across the EU, legal experts and crypto founders say the regulation may bring clarity, but not without casualties.

Features writer

Olga Primakova

Features writer

Olga Primakova

About Author

Olga started writing about cryptocurrency and finance in 2021.

Author Profile

Last updated:

May 29, 2025

Why Trust Cryptonews

Cryptonews has covered the cryptocurrency industry topics since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts have extensive experience in market analysis and blockchain technologies. We strive to maintain high editorial standards, focusing on factual accuracy and balanced reporting across all areas - from cryptocurrencies and blockchain projects to industry events, products, and technological developments. Our ongoing presence in the industry reflects our commitment to delivering relevant information in the evolving world of digital assets. Read more about Cryptonews

Key Takeaways:

MiCA is raising the bar for compliance, forcing smaller crypto firms to exit the EU market or radically adapt.
Experts say the real challenge isn’t legal. It’s cultural, as many teams must shift to operating like traditional finance firms.
Latvia is emerging as a MiCA frontrunner, thanks to fast-track licensing and early regulatory readiness.

The rollout of Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) has been one of the most significant regulatory shifts in Europe’s crypto landscape. With unified rules finally in place, the goal is to bring order to a fragmented market. But the transition won’t be easy for everyone.

At the UN:BLOCK conference in Riga, held on April 22–24, Cryptonews spoke with legal experts, industry founders, and regulatory insiders about what MiCA will actually change and who’s best positioned to adapt.

Compliance or Exit: How MiCA Is Reshaping the Market

Speaking with Cryptonews at the conference, Rūdolfs Eņģelis, partner at Sorainen, said:

In the short term, the market structure in the EU will be affected because smaller players, who cannot afford the cost and time burden of both getting the license and then ensuring ongoing compliance, will exit the EU market.

In the long term, MiCA may deepen global regulatory fragmentation unless major regions align on shared standards:

This risks causing silos or effectively divergent pockets of regulation globally, and crypto trading between these pockets will be impeded unless the key standards are unified.

Clarity, with Conditions

Reinis Znotins, co-founder of UN:BLOCK, told Cryptonews:

For the most part, it sets a solid framework, except when it comes to DAOs, which are still a gray area. Like with many new laws, the real test will be in how it’s applied.

Eņģelis agreed that regulatory expectations are still shifting, creating uncertainty:

New regulatory guidelines appear which are not always in line with what market players have expected.

From Paradigm Shift to Culture Shock

At the same event, Agneta Rumpa, senior associate at Sorainen, told Cryptonews:

For players who have been operating without a heavy regulatory framework for years, stepping into the MiCA licensing process means a true paradigm shift.

She explained that compliance now goes far beyond product design or user experience:

Teams need to start looking at all aspects of their business from the perspective of how a classic financial entity would operate, and having internal policies and procedures on not just products. But accounting, business continuity, management of conflicts of interest, highly regulated outsourcing of services from other firms, etc.

Innovation vs. Regulation: A Delicate Balance

When asked whether MiCA will make Europe more attractive for crypto innovation, Rumpa expressed cautious optimism:

The excitement that finally such a key market has clear and comprehensive rules… has already fizzled out, as the private market encounters that the ‘devil is in the details’.

Znotins added:

If the goal is to make Europe a hub for crypto and blockchain, the regulatory approach needs to allow room for smaller players to grow into full compliance, not shut them out from the start.

The Hardest Part? Operational Transformation

Martins Puke, Chief Legal Officer at Gravity Team, told Cryptonews:

The greatest challenge lies in the cultural and operational shift required to function in a fully regulated environment.

Puke noted:

We can put that down to the fact that this is a new sector, and regulators are themselves still learning about it, but that certainly causes challenges for applicants with time-to-market deadlines.

Where in Europe Is MiCA Working Best?

Multiple experts pointed to Latvia as one of the most crypto-friendly jurisdictions in the EU. Znotins highlighted:

Latvia stands out as one of the most attractive options. Companies can potentially get licensed in as little as 3 to 5 months.

Puke, who is closely involved with the Latvian Blockchain Association, added:

I’ve seen firsthand the political will to make Latvia a crypto hub.

Other jurisdictions, such as Poland and Belgium, have yet to fully empower their regulatory bodies under MiCA. This delay could cost them.

MiCA offers the structure and credibility the European crypto market has long lacked. But it also brings a steep learning curve. As smaller firms exit or adapt, the industry will consolidate around those who can meet the bar. If regulators balance enforcement with support, MiCA could help turn the EU into a global crypto powerhouse. Without that balance, innovation may look for a home elsewhere.