UK Judges Slam $11.9B Bitcoin SV Lawsuit – Proof of Losses Now Required

Author

Jimmy Aki

Author

Jimmy Aki

About Author

Jimmy has nearly 10 years of experience as a journalist and writer in the blockchain industry. He has worked with well-known publications such as Bitcoin Magazine, CCN, and Blockonomi, covering news...

Author Profile

Share

Copied

Last updated: 

May 22, 2025

Why Trust Cryptonews

Cryptonews has covered the cryptocurrency industry topics since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts have extensive experience in market analysis and blockchain technologies. We strive to maintain high editorial standards, focusing on factual accuracy and balanced reporting across all areas - from cryptocurrencies and blockchain projects to industry events, products, and technological developments. Our ongoing presence in the industry reflects our commitment to delivering relevant information in the evolving world of digital assets. Read more about Cryptonews

£9 billion in hoped-for gains evaporated when a UK court on May 21 slammed the Bitcoin SV lawsuit shut, ruling investors should have sold their coins immediately after the token’s delisting.

The bombshell verdict slams the door on speculative crypto lawsuits, demanding cold, hard proof of losses. The decision narrows the case to two investor groups, setting a strict precedent for courts requiring hard data, not hype, to award crypto compensation.

Why the Court’s ‘Duty to Mitigate’ Ruling Reshapes Crypto Litigation

The panel, led by Master of the Rolls Sir Geoffrey Vos, dismissed the growth theory as “speculative.” It also found Bitcoin SV lacked uniqueness, citing the claimants’ own comparisons with Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash.

Since Bitcoin SV kept trading on other platforms, the court used the market-mitigation rule. It stated: “Damages, if any, must reflect market value shortly after delisting—not hypothetical future highs.”

The ruling narrows the case to two groups: “Sub-class A” and “Sub-class C.”

“Sub-class A” investors who sold Bitcoin SV soon after the delistings can still pursue compensation for the immediate £16-per-coin drop identified by the Competition Appeal Tribunal.

“Sub-class C” users who lost access to their Bitcoin SV coins on exchanges such as Kraken or Binance may also proceed, but any award will be capped at the value of their holdings plus provable consequential losses.

Binance’s successful strike-out slashed its potential liability from over £10 billion to a small fraction.

The exchange, along with Bittylicious, Payward (Kraken’s parent), and ShapeShift, still faces the remaining claims. However, the court’s stance clarifies that future damages will depend on actual price data and not speculation.

UK Crypto Hub Dreams vs. Reality: Is Regulation Driving Talent Away?

Britain’s push to become a crypto hub keeps hitting obstacles, partly due to missteps by regulators and industry players.

Executives from Coinbase, Ripple, and Augmentum Fintech have criticized the UK government, citing slow licensing, unclear stablecoin policies, and a lack of local funding. These issues, they say, are driving startups to set up in the EU, Singapore, the Gulf, and the U.S. instead.

Coinbase UK’s Keith Grose warned that without faster, smarter regulation, Britain risks losing its fintech advantage. Augmentum’s Tim Levene added that risk-averse pension funds are starving homegrown crypto firms of much-needed capital.

Yet while the UK has been slow to update its rules, it hasn’t hesitated to enforce existing ones.

On April 28, the High Court in Manchester shut down BTCMining Limited after customers on six continents paid for crypto-mining contracts received no returns or withdrawals.

Insolvency Service investigators discovered the company had no genuine UK address and could not contact sole director Stibich Martins Yhaicha Luzia; its websites went dark once the probe began.

Action Fraud has logged losses topping £15,000, and officials fear the real tally is far higher. Chief investigator David Usher said the shutdown protects global consumers and shows regulators “will act quickly when crypto firms abuse trust.”

Will New Rules Attract or Strangle Crypto Firms?

Britain seems to be taking industry concerns seriously, launching consultations to shape its crypto regulations.

On May 1, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) opened discussions on staking, lending, borrowing, intermediaries, and DeFi, marking the next phase in the UK’s crypto rulemaking.

This follows the Treasury’s draft legislation, which expands oversight of exchanges, stablecoin issuers, and decentralized platforms.

Meanwhile, HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) announced stricter reporting rules starting January 1, 2026. Crypto platforms must now track and submit customer names, addresses, tax IDs, trade history, and transaction volumes or face fines of up to £300 per user for non-compliance.

The government positions these moves as consumer protection and a way to boost innovation.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves called the approach “open for business, closed to fraud” and promised close coordination with U.S. and EU regulators.

Industry groups welcome clarity, yet press Downing Street to appoint a dedicated crypto envoy to accelerate policy delivery and capture investment.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)