SEC Commissioners Dissent Against Agency’s First NFT Enforcement Action

Last updated:
Author
Author
Jai Pratap
About Author

Jai serves as the Asia Desk Editor for Cryptonews.com, where he leads a diverse team of international reporters. Jai has over five years of experience covering the web3 industry.

Last updated:
Why Trust Cryptonews
Cryptonews has covered the cryptocurrency industry topics since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts have extensive experience in market analysis and blockchain technologies. We strive to maintain high editorial standards, focusing on factual accuracy and balanced reporting across all areas - from cryptocurrencies and blockchain projects to industry events, products, and technological developments. Our ongoing presence in the industry reflects our commitment to delivering relevant information in the evolving world of digital assets. Read more about Cryptonews
Source: AdobeStock / Andriy Blokhin

In a display of dissent within the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Commissioners Hester Peirce and Mark T. Uyeda have expressed their reservations regarding the agency’s first NFT enforcement action against the media firm Impact Theory. 

The move marks the SEC’s first foray into regulating the non-fungible token (NFT) market.

As reported earlier, the US SEC has charged Impact Theory over its NFT launch, which the agency deemed an unregistered securities offering. 

Impact Theory had raised approximately $30 million through the sale of NFTs, claiming the tokens represented a stake in its ambitious entertainment venture likened to “building the next Disney.”

SEC Commissioners Disagree with Agency’s Action

Peirce and Uyeda have argued that the NFTs in question should not be subjected to the Howey analysis, a test traditionally used to determine whether a transaction qualifies as an investment contract. 

The Commissioners assert that categorizing NFTs as investment contracts oversimplifies the diverse rights that NFTs can confer upon digital and physical assets. 

They further argued that the complexities inherent in the NFT landscape necessitate careful consideration before enforcement actions are taken, especially since this case could set a precedent for future NFT offerings.

The Commissioners’ statement raises fundamental questions about the suitability of applying existing securities regulations to the evolving NFT market. 

With NFTs ranging in their utility from art and collectibles to access tokens and more, the regulatory landscape becomes challenging to navigate. 

Peirce and Uyeda’s concerns extend to the potential consequences of this enforcement action, specifically whether it implies a blanket classification of NFTs as securities offerings and the potential impact on creators’ ability to earn royalties from secondary market transactions.

Impact Theory Agree to Pay $6.1 Million in Penalty 

As part of the settlement reached with the SEC, Impact Theory agreed to a cease-and-desist order, a penalty of over $6.1 million, and the establishment of a Fair Fund to reimburse investors. 

The media firm also committed to relinquishing any future royalties from secondary market NFT transactions, a decision that could have major impact on the NFT creator community.

The dissenting viewpoint of Commissioners Peirce and Uyeda underscores the intricate regulatory challenges surrounding the burgeoning NFT ecosystem. 

After declaring over 60 plus cryptocurrencies as securities, the US SEC seems to be setting its eyes on the NFTs. 

More Articles

Blockchain News
SingularityNET, Mind Network Launch ASI Hub for Secure AI Services
Veronika Rinecker
Veronika Rinecker
2025-02-18 14:01:46
NFT News
NFT Sells for $3 Million, Signaling a Potential NFT Sector Revival
Sead Fadilpašić
Sead Fadilpašić
2025-02-18 13:57:44
Crypto News in numbers
editors
Authors List + 66 More
2M+
Active Monthly Users Around the World
250+
Guides and Reviews Articles
8
Years on the Market
70
International Team Authors