SBF Testifies: “F-ck Regulators”
We believe in full transparency with our readers. Some of our content includes affiliate links, and we may earn a commission through these partnerships. However, this potential compensation never influences our analysis, opinions, or reviews. Our editorial content is created independently of our marketing partnerships, and our ratings are based solely on our established evaluation criteria. Read More
Why Trust Cryptonews
Ad Disclosure
We believe in full transparency with our readers. Some of our content includes affiliate links, and we may earn a commission through these partnerships. Read more
Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) continued his testimony while fielding grilling questions from the prosecution in Manhattan federal court on Monday morning.
The defense finished their direct examination of Bankman-Fried earlier this morning, prompting Bankman-Fried to begin his cross-examination conducted by US Assistant Attorney Danielle Sassoon.
Prosecution grills Bankman-Fried
Sassoon began Bankman-Fried’s cross-examination by pushing the often circuitous Bankman-Fried to answer the questions presented directly, which included a number of statements Bankman-Fried made to the public and media.
In a number of tweets, Bankman-Fried wrote that FTX was the “most regulated crypto exchange by far” and that “funds and safety come first” on the platform. Similarly, in November 2022, Bankman-Fried claimed that Alameda played by the same rules as everyone else on the exchange.
In October 2022, Bankman-Fried claimed that customers would always be allowed to withdraw whatever funds they had on FTX. However, nearly two weeks later, Bankman-Fried’s crypto empire would collapse.
Moreover, Sassoon grilled Bankman-Fried on the relationship between FTX and its sister company, Alameda Research, causing the soft-spoken Bankman-Fried to hesitate. In several instances, Judge Kaplan asked Bankman-Fried to answer the question he was asked after the defendant failed to do so adequately.
“Would you say you were not at all involved in Alameda’s trading in 2022,” Sassoon questioned.
“It depends on how you define trading,” the FTX founder responded.
Damning Twitter messages
In another pointed moment during his time on the witness stand, Bankman-Fried was asked to read Twitter messages he sent to journalist Kelsey Piper in November 2022, which included admitting that much of what he said in regards to regulation was “just PR.”
This was quickly followed by another message written by the disgraced “king of crypto” that read “f-ck regulators.”
Sassoon then pointed out that Bankman-Fried would leverage Twitter as a means of communicating with users and potential customers who were a part of Crypto Twitter. Bankman-Fried then acknowledged he called a subset of these users “dumb motherf-ckers” in a private conversation.
SBF’s congressional testimony comes back to bite him
Sassoon then probed Bankman-Fried on his testimony before Congress, where the FTX founder claimed that users had “refunded collateral deposits instead of credit extensions” on the exchange.
The prosecution then noted that Alameda’s account on the exchange was allowed a $65 billion line of credit. Moreover, Alameda’s “special privileges” were never disclosed to customers or the public.
Meanwhile, Bankman-Fried claimed in an interview with Bloomberg that FTX and Alameda were “wholly separate entities.”
Bankman-Fried will continue his cross-examination this afternoon.
- How Tether Co-Founder William Quigley Views Crypto Regulations in Trump’s Second Term
- Trump Appoints PayPal Veteran David Sacks as ‘White House AI and Crypto Czar’
- Trump Media and Technology Group Files for ETFs, SMAs
- Trader Explains Why XRP Could Skyrocket to $100 After Tristan Tate X Post
- Bitwise’s Matt Hougan Makes Big Prediction on Bitcoin’s Next Bear Market
More Articles
in numbers
