{"id":251359,"date":"2026-03-02T09:55:45","date_gmt":"2026-03-02T09:55:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cryptonews.com\/tr\/?p=251359"},"modified":"2026-03-02T09:40:17","modified_gmt":"2026-03-02T09:40:17","slug":"binance-kayit-disi-token-mahkeme-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cryptonews.com\/tr\/news\/binance-kayit-disi-token-mahkeme-karari\/","title":{"rendered":"ABD’li Hakim, Binance \u0130\u00e7in Kar\u015f\u0131 A\u00e7\u0131lan Kay\u0131t D\u0131\u015f\u0131 Token Toplu Davas\u0131n\u0131n Devam Etmesine Karar Verdi"},"content":{"rendered":"

Manhattan’daki bir federal hakim, Binance’in uzun s\u00fcredir devam eden menkul k\u0131ymet davas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6zel tahkime ta\u015f\u0131ma talebini reddetti.<\/p>

Bu karar, borsan\u0131n ABD’li yat\u0131r\u0131mc\u0131lara kay\u0131t d\u0131\u015f\u0131 dijital tokenler satt\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131yla a\u00e7\u0131lan toplu davan\u0131n (class action) mahkemede devam etmesine olanak tan\u0131yor.<\/p>

ABD B\u00f6lge Hakimi Andrew L. Carter Jr., Per\u015fembe g\u00fcn\u00fc yay\u0131nlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnd.<\/p>

Binance\u2019in<\/a> \u015eubat 2019\u2019da Kullan\u0131m Ko\u015fullar\u0131\u2019n\u0131 bir tahkim toplu dava k\u0131s\u0131tlamas\u0131 ekleyecek \u015fekilde revize etti.<\/p>

Kullan\u0131c\u0131lar\u0131 bu konuda uygun \u015fekilde bilgilendirmedi\u011fine h\u00fckmetti.<\/p>

Kaliforniya, Nevada ve Teksas’tan m\u00fc\u015fterilerin olu\u015fturdu\u011fu davac\u0131 grubu, hesaplar\u0131n\u0131 Eyl\u00fcl 2017 ile Nisan 2018 tarihleri aras\u0131nda, yani s\u00f6z konusu h\u00fck\u00fcmler hen\u00fcz mevcut de\u011filken a\u00e7m\u0131\u015flard\u0131.<\/p>

Temyiz Mahkemesi Binance Menkul K\u0131ymetler Davas\u0131n\u0131 Yeniden Canland\u0131rd\u0131<\/h2><\/span>

Nisan 2020’de token sat\u0131\u015flar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik incelemelerin artt\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir d\u00f6nemdedir.<\/p>

Kripto borsalar\u0131na ve token ihra\u00e7\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lan dava dalgas\u0131n\u0131n bir par\u00e7as\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>

Bir alt mahkeme 2022’de \u015fikayeti reddetmi\u015fti. <\/p>

Yaln\u0131z \u0130kinci Devre Temyiz Mahkemesi, borsan\u0131n<\/a> resmi bir yerel merkezi olmamas\u0131na ra\u011fmen ABD menkul k\u0131ymetler yasalar\u0131n\u0131n Binance i\u00e7in ge\u00e7erli olabilece\u011fine karar vererek davay\u0131 2024’te yeniden canland\u0131rd\u0131.<\/p>

Y\u00fcksek Mahkeme, 2025’in ba\u015flar\u0131nda bu karar\u0131 incelemeyi reddetti. <\/p>

Binance<\/a>, 2019’da g\u00fcncellenen \u015fartlar\u0131n kullan\u0131c\u0131larla olan ili\u015fkiyi y\u00f6netti\u011fini savundu. <\/p>

Hakim Carter bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fe kat\u0131lmayarak, revize edilen \u015fartlar\u0131n sadece internet sitesinde yay\u0131nlanmas\u0131n\u0131n yeterli bildirim te\u015fkil etmedi\u011fini belirtti.<\/p>

Mahkeme, m\u00fc\u015fterilerin bir \u015firketin s\u00f6zle\u015fme dilini tek tarafl\u0131 olarak de\u011fi\u015ftirip de\u011fi\u015ftirmedi\u011fini rutin olarak kontrol etme g\u00f6revi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 vurgulad\u0131. <\/p>

Hakim, kullan\u0131c\u0131lar tahkim klozetini daha sonra dava s\u00fcrecinde \u00f6\u011frenmi\u015f olsalar bile, bunun geriye d\u00f6n\u00fck (retroactive) uygulanamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etti.<\/p>

Kaliforniya s\u00f6zle\u015fme hukukuna g\u00f6re, \u00f6nceki hak iddialar\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ele almayan tek tarafl\u0131 bir de\u011fi\u015fiklik.<\/p>

ge\u00e7mi\u015fteki davran\u0131\u015flarla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 anla\u015fmazl\u0131klar\u0131 s\u0131n\u0131rlamak i\u00e7in kullan\u0131lamaz. <\/p>

Borsa ayr\u0131ca “toplu dava feragatini” (class-action waiver) uygulamada da ba\u015far\u0131s\u0131z oldu. S\u00f6zle\u015fme ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda b\u00f6yle bir feragate at\u0131fta bulunulsa da, metin g\u00f6vdesinde bunun kapsam\u0131 hi\u00e7bir zaman tan\u0131mlanmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131. <\/p>

Hakim, kullan\u0131lan dili “belirsiz” olarak nitelendirdi.<\/p>

Standart s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyi, metni haz\u0131rlayan taraf olan Binance aleyhine yorumlad\u0131.<\/p>

Davac\u0131lar daha \u00f6nce, \u015eubat 2019 sonras\u0131 faaliyetlerle ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 iddialar\u0131 geri \u00e7ekti.<\/p>

Davay\u0131 daraltm\u0131\u015f ve iddialar\u0131 daha \u00f6nceki token sat\u0131\u015flar\u0131na odaklam\u0131\u015flard\u0131. <\/p>

Bu karar, \u00f6nemli bir usul engelini ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131yor.<\/p>

Davan\u0131n, listelenen belirli tokenlerin “menkul k\u0131ymet” niteli\u011fi ta\u015f\u0131y\u0131p ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair esasl\u0131 tart\u0131\u015fmalara do\u011fru ilerlemesine izin veriyor.<\/p>

ABD’li Senat\u00f6rlerden Binance’e Yapt\u0131r\u0131m ve Kara Para Aklama \u0130ncelemesi \u00c7a\u011fr\u0131s\u0131<\/h2><\/span>

Binance’in Washington’da yenilenen siyasi incelemelerle kar\u015f\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131ya kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir d\u00f6neme denk geliyor.<\/p>

11 ABD’li senat\u00f6rden olu\u015fan bir grup, k\u0131sa s\u00fcre \u00f6nce federal yetkililerden borsan\u0131n yapt\u0131r\u0131mlara ve kara para aklama kar\u015f\u0131t\u0131 (AML) gerekliliklere uyup uymad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 incelemelerini istedi.<\/p>

Milletvekilleri, platform \u00fczerinden \u0130ran ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 kurulu\u015flara yakla\u015f\u0131k 1,7 milyar dolarl\u0131k dijital varl\u0131k aktar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddialar\u0131na ve yeni \u00f6deme \u00fcr\u00fcnleri arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla olas\u0131 yapt\u0131r\u0131m delinmesine dair raporlar\u0131 gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterdi. <\/p>

\n

Roughly 20% of people change jobs yearly. It's normal. Organziation should have turnover. People move to better jobs. More growth\/promotion opportunites for remaining team too.

(Not picking on Tom or EF, just making a point that people don't need to spin job changes related to\u2026 https:\/\/t.co\/EqcmfpaAZ2<\/a><\/p>— CZ \ud83d\udd36 BNB (@cz_binance) February 13, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>