{"id":181997,"date":"2026-07-22T14:56:00","date_gmt":"2026-07-22T14:56:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cryptonews.com\/fr\/news\/michael-saylor-opposes-bip-110-bitcoin-governance-risk\/"},"modified":"2026-07-22T08:00:35","modified_gmt":"2026-07-22T08:00:35","slug":"michael-saylor-opposes-bip-110-bitcoin-governance-risk","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cryptonews.com\/fr\/news\/michael-saylor-opposes-bip-110-bitcoin-governance-risk\/","title":{"rendered":"Bitcoin : Michael Saylor rejette le BIP-110 et son risque"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/cimg.co\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2026\/07\/21095617\/content-inline-1-30.jpg\" alt=\"\"><\/figure><p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Dans l&rsquo;actualit\u00e9 Bitcoin du jour, <strong>Michael Saylor<\/strong>, co-fondateur de <strong>MicroStrategy<\/strong> et plus grand d\u00e9tenteur de BTC cot\u00e9 en bourse, a officiellement pris position contre le <strong>BIP-110<\/strong>. Ce projet de soft fork d&rsquo;un an vise \u00e0 restreindre le stockage de donn\u00e9es non financi\u00e8res sur la blockchain Bitcoin. Saylor soutient que le rem\u00e8de propos\u00e9 pr\u00e9sente un risque syst\u00e9mique plus important que le probl\u00e8me qu&rsquo;il tente de r\u00e9soudre.<\/p><p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Sa critique, publi\u00e9e sur X et relay\u00e9e par la <strong>Bitcoin Foundation<\/strong> le 11 juillet, d\u00e9place le d\u00e9bat : il ne s&rsquo;agit plus d&rsquo;une simple gestion du spam, mais d&rsquo;une question fondamentale de gouvernance. Qui d\u00e9cide de la validit\u00e9 d&rsquo;une transaction, et quelles sont les cons\u00e9quences une fois qu&rsquo;une telle ligne est trac\u00e9e au sein du protocole ?<\/p><figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-x wp-block-embed-x\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"550\" data-dnt=\"true\"><p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">Many Bitcoiners I respect support BIP 110. I understand and share their desire to protect Bitcoin, but believe the proposed cure is more dangerous than the condition. Here are 110 reasons why Bitcoin needs guardians of neutrality. <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/hOAqfAgC58\">https:\/\/t.co\/hOAqfAgC58<\/a><\/p>&mdash; Michael Saylor (@saylor) <a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/saylor\/status\/2078754106030649740?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">July 19, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.x.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script>\n<\/div><\/figure><p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Ce cadrage souligne le probl\u00e8me du pr\u00e9c\u00e9dent. Comme l&rsquo;a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 Saylor dans son post sur X : \u00ab Le BIP-110 transforme un diff\u00e9rend sur le spam en un changement de consensus qui invaliderait certaines transactions actuellement valides et payantes. \u00bb Selon lui, c&rsquo;est ce pr\u00e9c\u00e9dent qui constitue le v\u00e9ritable danger. <\/p><p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">L&rsquo;inqui\u00e9tude ne porte pas sp\u00e9cifiquement sur les <strong>Ordinals<\/strong> ou le spam actuel, mais sur ce que devient le protocole s&rsquo;il commence \u00e0 filtrer les transactions selon leur intention per\u00e7ue plut\u00f4t que sur le paiement des frais et la validit\u00e9 cryptographique.<\/p><h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Bitcoin News : Le seuil des mineurs comme point de rupture<\/h2><span class=\"replacer\"><\/span><figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-x wp-block-embed-x\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"550\" data-dnt=\"true\"><p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">Saylor Pushes Back Against Bitcoin Soft Fork Plan<br><br>Michael Saylor (<a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/saylor?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">@saylor<\/a>) has urged the Bitcoin <a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/search?q=%24BTC&amp;src=ctag&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">$BTC<\/a> community to reject BIP 110, a proposed software update that would temporarily limit certain data stored on the blockchain. <br><br>He argued Bitcoin should remain neutral and only\u2026 <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/xmdNsSdZPC\">pic.twitter.com\/xmdNsSdZPC<\/a><\/p>&mdash; BSCN (@BSCNews) <a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/BSCNews\/status\/2079059222034370708?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">July 20, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.x.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script>\n<\/div><\/figure><p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Les m\u00e9canismes d&rsquo;activation du BIP-110 suscitent autant de critiques que son contenu. La proposition serait adopt\u00e9e si les mineurs signalent leur soutien dans au moins 55 % des blocs sur une p\u00e9riode de 2 016 blocs. Ce chiffre est bien inf\u00e9rieur au seuil de 95 % historiquement requis pour les changements de consensus permanents sur Bitcoin.<\/p><p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Michael Saylor<\/strong> a qualifi\u00e9 cette r\u00e9duction de risque structurel, avertissant qu&rsquo;elle pourrait provoquer une scission du r\u00e9seau et une incertitude prolong\u00e9e sur le march\u00e9, alors qu&rsquo;aucune menace sous-jacente ne justifie une telle perturbation. Le tableau actuel du signalement des mineurs donne du relief \u00e0 cet avertissement : au 13 juillet, le soutien s&rsquo;\u00e9levait \u00e0 environ 1,3 %, selon le moniteur public <a href=\"https:\/\/bip110.org\">bip110.org<\/a>. La date limite pour le signalement volontaire est fix\u00e9e aux alentours du bloc 961 542 en ao\u00fbt.<\/p><p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Un seuil de 55 % est agressif selon les standards historiques de la gouvernance Bitcoin. Avec seulement 1,3 % de soutien, cet objectif semble inatteignable, mais le seuil en lui-m\u00eame demeure une pr\u00e9occupation majeure. La port\u00e9e technique de la proposition est vaste pour une mesure cens\u00e9e \u00eatre temporaire : le BIP-110 restaurerait une limite plus stricte sur les sorties OP_RETURN, restreindrait les t\u00e9l\u00e9chargements de donn\u00e9es volumineuses et rejetterait des blocs contenant des transactions pourtant valides selon les r\u00e8gles actuelles.<\/p><h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Neutralit\u00e9 de Bitcoin contre contr\u00f4le du protocole<\/h2><span class=\"replacer\"><\/span><p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">L&rsquo;argument de fond de Saylor est que la neutralit\u00e9 de Bitcoin n&rsquo;est pas une simple pr\u00e9f\u00e9rence, mais une propri\u00e9t\u00e9 structurelle que le r\u00e9seau ne peut se permettre de compromettre. Avec cette annonce, la proposition transforme un changement de r\u00e8gles destin\u00e9 \u00e0 lutter contre le spam en une d\u00e9cision sur les types de transactions valides que le r\u00e9seau devrait accepter, soulevant des craintes quant \u00e0 l&rsquo;introduction d&rsquo;un jugement moral ou arbitraire dans le protocole.<\/p><p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">La logique de l&rsquo;effet dissuasif suit imm\u00e9diatement. Si les r\u00e8gles de consensus peuvent \u00eatre modifi\u00e9es pour exclure le stockage de donn\u00e9es parce qu&rsquo;une partie de la communaut\u00e9 le juge importun, le m\u00eame m\u00e9canisme pourrait \u00eatre utilis\u00e9 pour d&rsquo;autres cat\u00e9gories de transactions. Les investisseurs institutionnels et les entreprises qui ont suivi l&rsquo;exemple de <strong>MicroStrategy<\/strong> parient implicitement sur la stabilit\u00e9 du protocole. Un m\u00e9canisme de gouvernance capable d&rsquo;exclure des cas d&rsquo;utilisation valides introduit un risque d\u00e9connect\u00e9 du prix ou de la macro\u00e9conomie.<\/p><p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Il existe \u00e9galement un argument direct li\u00e9 aux revenus des mineurs. Supprimer des usages on-chain, quel que soit leur int\u00e9r\u00eat esth\u00e9tique, peut affecter la demande de frais de transaction. Pour Saylor, les frais bas\u00e9s sur le march\u00e9 et les politiques de relais individuelles sont les bons outils pour g\u00e9rer le trafic de donn\u00e9es ind\u00e9sirable, car ils fonctionnent sans alt\u00e9rer le consensus et peuvent \u00eatre ajust\u00e9s sans coordination globale du r\u00e9seau.<\/p><h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Une opposition plus large et les prochaines \u00e9tapes<\/h2><span class=\"replacer\"><\/span><p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Michael Saylor n&rsquo;est pas la seule voix influente \u00e0 s&rsquo;opposer au projet. D&rsquo;autres contributeurs de longue date de <strong>Bitcoin<\/strong> ont \u00e9galement rejet\u00e9 publiquement le BIP-110. Ce d\u00e9bat a mis en lumi\u00e8re une tension plus large sur le pouvoir de veto au sein de l&rsquo;\u00e9cosyst\u00e8me : qui des mineurs, des d\u00e9veloppeurs, des op\u00e9rateurs de n\u0153uds ou des grands d\u00e9tenteurs d\u00e9tient le dernier mot ?<\/p><p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Avec un soutien des mineurs proche de z\u00e9ro \u00e0 six semaines de l&rsquo;\u00e9ch\u00e9ance d&rsquo;ao\u00fbt, le BIP-110 semble difficile \u00e0 imposer. Cependant, l&rsquo;argument de gouvernance soulev\u00e9 par Saylor ne dispara\u00eetra pas avec cette proposition. La question de savoir si la couche de consensus de Bitcoin doit \u00eatre utilis\u00e9e pour discriminer certains types de transactions est d\u00e9sormais pos\u00e9e.<\/p><p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"> MicroStrategy d\u00e9tient environ <strong>843 775 BTC<\/strong> ; la position de Saylor n&rsquo;est donc pas une simple posture philosophique, mais la d\u00e9fense du plus grand bilan corporate en Bitcoin au monde en faveur de la neutralit\u00e9 du protocole.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Michael Saylor s&rsquo;oppose au BIP-110, d\u00e9non\u00e7ant un risque syst\u00e9mique pour la neutralit\u00e9 de Bitcoin et une modification dangereuse des r\u00e8gles de consensus.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":759,"featured_media":181988,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"editors":[2551],"sponsored_companies":[],"class_list":["post-181997","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","editors-julien-leroy"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Bitcoin : Michael Saylor rejette le BIP-110 et son risque<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Michael Saylor s&#039;oppose au BIP-110, d\u00e9non\u00e7ant un risque syst\u00e9mique pour la neutralit\u00e9 de Bitcoin et une modification dangereuse des r\u00e8gles de consensus.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/cryptonews.com\/fr\/news\/michael-saylor-opposes-bip-110-bitcoin-governance-risk\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"fr_FR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bitcoin : Michael Saylor rejette le BIP-110 et son risque\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Michael Saylor s&#039;oppose au BIP-110, d\u00e9non\u00e7ant un risque syst\u00e9mique pour la neutralit\u00e9 de Bitcoin et une modification dangereuse des r\u00e8gles de consensus.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/cryptonews.com\/fr\/news\/michael-saylor-opposes-bip-110-bitcoin-governance-risk\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Cryptonews France\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-22T14:56:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/cimg.co\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2026\/07\/21095612\/michael-saylor-opposes-bip-110-bitcoin-governance-risk-featured.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"675\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/cimg.co\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2026\/07\/21095612\/michael-saylor-opposes-bip-110-bitcoin-governance-risk-featured.jpg\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bitcoin : Michael Saylor rejette le BIP-110 et son risque","description":"Michael Saylor s'oppose au BIP-110, d\u00e9non\u00e7ant un risque syst\u00e9mique pour la neutralit\u00e9 de Bitcoin et une modification dangereuse des r\u00e8gles de consensus.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/cryptonews.com\/fr\/news\/michael-saylor-opposes-bip-110-bitcoin-governance-risk\/","og_locale":"fr_FR","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bitcoin : Michael Saylor rejette le BIP-110 et son risque","og_description":"Michael Saylor s'oppose au BIP-110, d\u00e9non\u00e7ant un risque syst\u00e9mique pour la neutralit\u00e9 de Bitcoin et une modification dangereuse des r\u00e8gles de consensus.","og_url":"https:\/\/cryptonews.com\/fr\/news\/michael-saylor-opposes-bip-110-bitcoin-governance-risk\/","og_site_name":"Cryptonews France","article_published_time":"2026-07-22T14:56:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":675,"url":"https:\/\/cimg.co\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2026\/07\/21095612\/michael-saylor-opposes-bip-110-bitcoin-governance-risk-featured.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_image":"https:\/\/cimg.co\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2026\/07\/21095612\/michael-saylor-opposes-bip-110-bitcoin-governance-risk-featured.jpg","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https:\/\/cryptonews.com\/fr\/news\/michael-saylor-opposes-bip-110-bitcoin-governance-risk\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/cryptonews.com\/fr\/news\/michael-saylor-opposes-bip-110-bitcoin-governance-risk\/"},"author":{"name":"domn","@id":"https:\/\/cryptonews.com\/fr\/#\/schema\/person\/ee71dab52357fad76733d6c98d482558"},"headline":"Bitcoin : Michael Saylor rejette le BIP-110 et son risque","datePublished":"2026-07-22T14:56:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/cryptonews.com\/fr\/news\/michael-saylor-opposes-bip-110-bitcoin-governance-risk\/"},"wordCount":937,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/cryptonews.com\/fr\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/cryptonews.com\/fr\/news\/michael-saylor-opposes-bip-110-bitcoin-governance-risk\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/cimg.co\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2026\/07\/21095612\/michael-saylor-opposes-bip-110-bitcoin-governance-risk-featured.jpg","articleSection":["News"],"inLanguage":"fr-FR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/cryptonews.com\/fr\/news\/michael-saylor-opposes-bip-110-bitcoin-governance-risk\/#respond"]}],"copyrightYear":"2026","copyrightHolder":{"@id":"https:\/\/cryptonews.com\/#organization"}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/cryptonews.com\/fr\/news\/michael-saylor-opposes-bip-110-bitcoin-governance-risk\/","url":"https:\/\/cryptonews.com\/fr\/news\/michael-saylor-opposes-bip-110-bitcoin-governance-risk\/","name":"Bitcoin : Michael Saylor rejette le BIP-110 et son risque","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/cryptonews.com\/fr\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/cryptonews.com\/fr\/news\/michael-saylor-opposes-bip-110-bitcoin-governance-risk\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/cryptonews.com\/fr\/news\/michael-saylor-opposes-bip-110-bitcoin-governance-risk\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/cimg.co\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2026\/07\/21095612\/michael-saylor-opposes-bip-110-bitcoin-governance-risk-featured.jpg","datePublished":"2026-07-22T14:56:00+00:00","description":"Michael Saylor s'oppose au BIP-110, d\u00e9non\u00e7ant un risque syst\u00e9mique pour la neutralit\u00e9 de Bitcoin et une modification dangereuse des r\u00e8gles de consensus.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/cryptonews.com\/fr\/news\/michael-saylor-opposes-bip-110-bitcoin-governance-risk\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"fr-FR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/cryptonews.com\/fr\/news\/michael-saylor-opposes-bip-110-bitcoin-governance-risk\/"]}],"author":[]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/cryptonews.com\/fr\/news\/michael-saylor-opposes-bip-110-bitcoin-governance-risk\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/cimg.co\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2026\/07\/21095612\/michael-saylor-opposes-bip-110-bitcoin-governance-risk-featured.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/cimg.co\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2026\/07\/21095612\/michael-saylor-opposes-bip-110-bitcoin-governance-risk-featured.jpg","width":1200,"height":675},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/cryptonews.com\/fr\/news\/michael-saylor-opposes-bip-110-bitcoin-governance-risk\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/cryptonews.com\/fr\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bitcoin : Michael Saylor rejette le BIP-110 et son risque"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/cryptonews.com\/fr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/cryptonews.com\/fr\/","name":"Cryptonews","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/cryptonews.com\/fr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/cryptonews.com\/fr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"fr-FR"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/cryptonews.com\/fr\/#organization","name":"Cryptonews France","url":"https:\/\/cryptonews.com\/fr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/cryptonews.com\/fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/cryptonews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/09\/4.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/cryptonews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/09\/4.jpg","width":1669,"height":874,"caption":"Cryptonews France"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/cryptonews.com\/fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cryptonews.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/181997","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cryptonews.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cryptonews.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cryptonews.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/759"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cryptonews.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=181997"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/cryptonews.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/181997\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":182004,"href":"https:\/\/cryptonews.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/181997\/revisions\/182004"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cryptonews.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/181988"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cryptonews.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=181997"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cryptonews.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=181997"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cryptonews.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=181997"},{"taxonomy":"editors","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cryptonews.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/editors?post=181997"},{"taxonomy":"sponsored_companies","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cryptonews.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/sponsored_companies?post=181997"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}